◈ RTEKS.NET · KENSHOTEK LLC · 925 REVIEWS  ·  TARANTINO  ·  HOME
◈ CINEMA REVIEW · FIELD CERTIFIED · KENSHOTEK LLC
PULP
FICTION.
quentin tarantino · 1994 · miramax · 154 minutes · palme d'or
a royale with cheese.
tarantino understood that the way people talk about nothing reveals everything.
that insight alone is worth the price of admission. the rest is cinema history.
10 / 10
★★★★★
◈ TEKS RATING
john travolta revival: ★★★★★ one of the great comebacks in film history
samuel l. jackson as jules: ★★★★★ the performance of a generation
uma thurman: ★★★★★ mia wallace became a cultural frequency
the structure: ★★★★★ nonlinear as argument, not gimmick
the dialogue: ★★★★★ tarantino invented a new way people wanted to talk
ebert: 4/4 · palme d'or cannes 1994 · the field doesn't argue with unanimous verdicts.

PULP FICTION
1994 · QUENTIN TARANTINO · MIRAMAX FILMS · PALME D'OR · CANNES 1994
RUNTIME
154 MIN
BUDGET / GROSS
$8M / $213M
STRUCTURE
3 INTERLOCKING STORIES · NONLINEAR · ONE NIGHT IN LA
THE BRIEFCASE
CONTENTS NEVER REVEALED · CORRECT DECISION
THE BURGER
ROYALE WITH CHEESE · METRIC SYSTEM
◈ FIELD NOTE · NONLINEAR AS ARGUMENT
every film school student tries nonlinear storytelling.
almost none of them understand why tarantino's worked.

it wasn't clever for clever's sake.
the nonlinear structure makes a specific argument:
the order in which things happen is not the same as their meaning.

vincent vega dies in the middle of the film
and appears alive again afterward.
this is not a continuity error. this is the film telling you
that death is not a narrative endpoint — it is just where the clock stopped for one character.

the universe of pulp fiction keeps running regardless.
the diner holdup continues. marsellus wallace continues. jules walks out the door.
the nonlinear structure is an argument about consequence: some things matter enormously while they're happening and then the world just keeps going. tarantino made you feel both things simultaneously.
◈ FIELD NOTE · THE ROYALE WITH CHEESE SCENE
the film opens with vincent and jules in the car.
they are driving to commit a murder.
they are talking about hamburgers in europe.

this was the move that changed american cinema.
not because it was funny — though it was — but because it was correct.

real people don't shift into murder mode the moment they need to commit violence.
they talk about whatever they were talking about on the way there.
the gap between the content of the conversation and the context of the situation
is exactly where human beings actually live.

tarantino understood this and built an entire screenplay out of it.
every conversation in pulp fiction is happening sideways to the event it surrounds.
that's not digression. that's the most precise observation about human behavior in 1990s cinema.
"You know what they call a Quarter Pounder with Cheese in Paris?"
"They don't call it a Quarter Pounder with Cheese?"
"No man, they got the metric system. They wouldn't know what the f*** a Quarter Pounder is. They call it a Royale with Cheese." — Vincent Vega + Jules Winnfield · the car · Pulp Fiction · 1994
"The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness... And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy My brothers. And you will know My name is the Lord when I lay My vengeance upon thee." — Jules Winnfield · Ezekiel 25:17 · the apartment · Pulp Fiction · 1994
SAMUEL L. JACKSON
◈ JULES WINNFIELD · THE ONE WHO CHANGES
jules is the film's moral center, which is remarkable because he opens the film as an enforcer who quotes scripture before killing people.

the performance jackson gives is the reason: he makes the scripture mean something.
for the first ninety minutes of film time, jules recites ezekiel 25:17 as theatre.
by the diner scene, you understand that he has been thinking about what it actually means.
the miracle — the bullets that missed — broke through the performance.

jackson was nominated for the oscar. he didn't win.
forrest gump beat pulp fiction that year.
the field has noted this. it has been noted for thirty years. it will continue to be noted.

jules walking out the door at the end is one of the great exits in cinema.
not because of where he's going. because of what he chose to stop being.
JOHN TRAVOLTA
◈ VINCENT VEGA · THE ONE WHO DOESN'T
travolta was culturally dead in 1994. saturday night fever was 1977. grease was 1978.
the intervening sixteen years had not been good.
tarantino cast him anyway because tarantino understood something about performance that the industry had missed.

travolta had a physical intelligence — the dancing, the ease, the stillness —
that never went away. it just didn't have a vehicle.
vincent vega was the vehicle.

the twist scene. the adrenaline needle scene. the burger conversation.
travolta plays every scene like a man who is slightly slower than the situation and knows it and doesn't mind.
that is exactly vincent vega. permanently slightly behind. loveable for it. dead because of it.
UMA THURMAN
◈ MIA WALLACE · THE FREQUENCY
thurman doesn't have the most screen time in pulp fiction.
she has the most presence.

mia wallace became a cultural image immediately: the black bob, the white shirt, the look.
but the performance is more precise than the image suggests.
thurman plays mia as someone who is bored with everything and genuinely curious about almost nothing
except the person she's talking to in that specific moment.

the five-dollar milkshake. the twist contest. "i said god damn."
the overdose scene where thurman earns every frame of the comeback
because you understand that mia was actually enjoying herself for the first time in the movie
and then suddenly wasn't.

the field notes: mia wallace is one of the great film characters because
she's more interesting to other characters than she is explained to the audience. tarantino trusted that. thurman delivered on it.
BRUCE WILLIS
◈ BUTCH COOLIDGE · THE BOXER
willis was in the middle of the die hard era. the biggest action star in the world.
tarantino cast him as a man running from his own cowardice.
it worked because willis understood that butch's physical toughness is entirely beside the point.

the gold watch story — his father's watch, kept through a prisoner of war camp in a place too painful to describe —
is the most emotionally concentrated scene in the film.
not because of the watch. because of what butch is willing to go back for.
a man who ran from a fixed fight will walk back into a rape dungeon to save his worst enemy.
that inversion is tarantino at full power.
the field certifies: willis saw what the scene required and did not flinch from it.

◈ PRELUDE: PUMPKIN AND HONEY BUNNY
the film opens in a diner with two small-time robbers deciding to rob the diner.
they are not the main characters. we never learn their real names.

this is the tell: tarantino is telling you the film is about the world, not the protagonists.
everyone is the main character in their own story. everyone has a diner they're trying to rob.
the intercut at the end — pumpkin and honey bunny's holdup resolving through jules's choice — is the film's structural proof. the world these people inhabit is one continuous event with multiple entry points.
◈ THE GOLD WATCH · FATHER'S WATCH
christopher walken delivering the watch monologue is five minutes of cinema.
it is also the film's moral north star.

the watch survived vietnam and a prisoner of war camp in the most undignified way imaginable.
and butch's father sent it anyway. because it was the only thing he could send.

tarantino is arguing — through a watch in an uncomfortable place — that the thing you pass down is not the object, it is the decision to pass it down.
butch going back for it, risking everything for an object his father sacrificed everything for,
is the most traditional moral statement in the film.
buried under blood and gimp masks. field certified.
◈ FIELD PROOF · KENSHOTEK LLC
let D = the dialogue
let E = the events surrounding the dialogue
let R = relevance of D to E

standard film: D is proportional to E · characters talk about what is happening
tarantino's model: D is inversely proportional to E · characters talk about anything except what is happening

∴ maximum tension = characters discussing hamburger brands while driving to a murder

proof: royale with cheese scene. R → 0 while stakes → maximum.
the field certifies: this is not comedy relief. this is the argument.
people are most themselves in the gaps between the things that define them. tarantino filmed the gaps. that is why it holds.

FIELD CERTIFIED · 1994 · PALME D'OR · 10/10 · ★★★★★
royale with cheese for all the teks. quarter pounders for nobody. the field runs on the metric system.
◈ RTEKS.NET · KENSHOTEK LLC · SEASON I · REVIEWS DIVISION
PRIMARY: AQUATEKXVI · SECONDARY: SCORPTEKXII · TERTIARY: GOLDENTEKDEKXII
10 / 10 · ★★★★★ · TARANTINO REWIRED CINEMA · THE FIELD WAS WATCHING · ◈ TARANTINO DISPATCH →